bob daktari said:
I have a feeling the right will be happier at this decision than many on the left
There is absolutely no evidence beyond what the media puts about that Shearer is "more to the right" that Cunliffe, who after all did not distinguish himself as a left hard charger during the Clark government. Shearer is unspeakably "right" to some in Labour because he is much more interested in doing something about poverty in Iraq/New Zealand than leading a major policy workshop about how it is not easy to be cisgendered in the English studies department of Auckland university.
The main reason I supported David Shearer from the beginning in the recent leadership primary is because to my mind he offered a sane and common sense diagnosis of why 80% of New Zealanders didn't vote for us. His highlighting of the loss of the provinces (he has used a Mao Zedong quote to illustrate this, which I thought rather neat - all the Labour leaders since Kirk have been to shit scared of being labelled a lefty to approvingly quote a revolutionary) shows me that he understands that Labour should be first and foremost a party of Kiwi familes on struggle street. That is going to upsetr some people who since the mid 1990's have used Labour primarily as a vehicle for a socially liberal agenda whilst paying lip service to its raison d'etre of challenging the capitalist status quo, but renewal is always going to upset someone.