chief said:
Massive difference between TAGGING and BOMBING
One is for wannabe gangsters while the other is valid artistic expression such as Keith Harring. He had an exhibition a while back at Te Papa. I don't know much about art but i know what i like, and i really like a good bit of graffiti art.
whether it be a tag, a throw up, a bomb, a sketch whatever - it is all a part of the graffiti culture - unfortunatly it ain't so real anymore which isn't all bad it means money can be made from it - but back in the day it was such an ill culture (not talking from experience) it never used to be in mags, or on the internet, it was on a train, a wall and it was free,.. now it all costs money, graf is marketed, may not be right or wrong but its different now everything evolves eventually.....
cuse my blabbering here, i just have alot of respec for the art and the culture and it's all a part of the culture - a small tag of someones name is where they first get inspiration to turn that shit into an ill piece
This is the guy that started it all---->
Taki 183:Initiator of Tagging
At about the same time as Keith Haring, a delivery messenger began writing "Taki 183" whenever he delivered documents. Soon his name was all over the city. Newspapers and magazines wrote articles about him and Keith Haring. Both became celebrities. This claim to fame attracted many young people, especially those involved with rapping. They began to imitate "Taki 183".
And another bit from the same article outta interest fo yo all......
While most taggers are simply interested in seeing their name in as many places as possible and as visibly as possible, some taggers are more contented to find secluded warehouse walls where they can practice their pieces. Some of these taggers are able to sell twelve foot canvases of their work for upwards of 10 - 12 thousand dollars