2134 of 62457 members online
Coffee Machines 720 GetFrank GymJunkie Menu Mania Snow Surf Varsity

Forgot Your Password? Create Account
[quote]
So NZ vs Aus is awesome! Aus attacked with spin whereas NZ has a battery of 3 120kmh chicks (the equivalent would be say 90mph/145kmh in mens) who are giving the Aussies a real work over with some short pitched bowling etc.

Just reduced them to 71/4.

At least our women can bowl.
[quote]
123/6, Aus need 80-odd in 19 overs
Rain is making it tough on the Kiwi bowlers now... ball slipping from hands

too many dropped catches too Sad
[quote]
Horrible collapse initially from our girls but a great performance with the ball as you say. We should have been able to get 230 from the base we set.

Still great win initially. Since I do nothing most of the time I'm gonna try and keep an eye on the WWC.

Smile

gc.
[quote]
would be pretty awesome to beat Aus in another WC in Aus Smile
[quote]
Just had a flick through the guide on the Skytv website and noticed that instead of playing the 2 other NZ games this week, we get to watch England play India, then watch England play Pakistan on Thursday too.

Fucking hell. What are these idiots at Sky doing!?

Another email sent.

Neutral

gc.
[quote]
Oh man looking at some of the old stats from Women's cricket is quite funny. Check this hiding out:

http://content.cricinfo.com/ci/engine/match/67194.html

Laughing

gc.
[quote]
Laughing Laughing Laughing
[quote]
Every single surname in the Danish team except for one ends with "sen" heh.
[quote]
Mutant said:
would be pretty awesome to beat Aus in another WC in Aus Smile


Especially by peppering them with bouncers

It was amusing to watch... Aussies just didn't look comfy, couple of top edged hooks, but apart from that a lot of weaving around!
[quote]
Can't even get live feed on Cricinfo of our game or Australia's. Obviously VERY little demand for this WWC. I can't help but feel it would be a little more popular if it were pushed a little harder though1?

Confused

gc.
[quote]
What is the story with cricket anyway? If one of these girls was putting down a Chatfield like line and length at 120kph for ten overs and could knock a useful 20 or so against any attack, could she be picked for the Black Caps??
[quote]
fish_boy said:
What is the story with cricket anyway? If one of these girls was putting down a Chatfield like line and length at 120kph for ten overs and could knock a useful 20 or so against any attack, could she be picked for the Black Caps??

Probably not. Most mens club sides would annihilate the women's cricket team.
[quote]
Supamaorifulla said:
Can't even get live feed on Cricinfo of our game or Australia's. Obviously VERY little demand for this WWC. I can't help but feel it would be a little more popular if it were pushed a little harder though1?

Confused

gc.


England vs India had some sweet batting by England. That Claire Taylor was pounding some VERY nice shots, that straight six was beautiful. Easily best women's batting I've ever seen!
[quote]
VICTORY for our girls. 2 from 2 and we're guaranteed into the Super 6 already. Look out, world!

:>

gc.
[quote]
Supamaorifulla said:
Oh man looking at some of the old stats from Women's cricket is quite funny. Check this hiding out:

http://content.cricinfo.com/ci/engine/match/67194.html

Laughing

gc.


Well done to her, and I'm not misogynist, honestly, but I hope Ms Clark had a quiet word to the scorers about how she should be referred to on there, in the future...
[quote]
Yeah :> I notice no neil_a or reaction or gummi... quiet as meeces, me thinks!!

At least we're winners in ONE type of cricket!
[quote]
Pretty curious that only NZ, Aus and England are even remotely good at women's cricket. What do Saffa women play?? They're rubbish at netball, hockey too?

Do you just keep 'em at home cooking the eggs?

Confused

gc.
[quote]
Q will now pull out that "Lucy-Jaapie von Killkaffirenstein is the world champion of schmoople"
[quote]
Excellent. At least the woman cricketers can win something. More manly then most of the men more than likely.

Music
[quote]
Supamaorifulla said:
Pretty curious that only NZ, Aus and England are even remotely good at women's cricket. What do Saffa women play?? They're rubbish at netball, hockey too?

Do you just keep 'em at home cooking the eggs?

Confused

gc.


I think leaving home is grounds for rape.
[quote]
Going nicely

One thing all women batsmen seem to do that infuriates me is play back to 90% of all deliveries - especially off spinners. It works if you're Tendulkar, but I think they'd be better advised to get forward more.
[quote]
Really? The pace is so slow there seems to be very little risk of an LBW etc. Don't forget their reach as they come down the pitch is a LOT less than your average international male cricketer. Even with a big stride it's difficult for them to get to the pitch.

I just find it frustrating in general to watch. The amount of slow, wide half volleys that are served up is insufferable. It's almost like the women don't work on the wrist/forearm strength at all, they're terrible through the covers.

Smile

gc.
[quote]
Pulford WTF. Got to about 60 and totally lost it in the head. Trying to dominate possibly, but all they needed to do was push it round for her to get a 100, and NZ to register an easy victory.

Neutral

gc.
[quote]
You always put more power on the ball if you're moving forward smf, look at baseball; you're using your body more than just your wrists/arms which is what you're using when forcing offside off the back foot.

Good late performance by the girls, that batting powerplay was crucial!
[quote]
vadinho said:
You always put more power on the ball if you're moving forward smf, look at baseball; you're using your body more than just your wrists/arms which is what you're using when forcing offside off the back foot.


Not what I'm debating at all. I'm just saying they struggle to get to the pitch properly, which is why they sit on their heels.

Smile

gc.
[quote]
Supamaorifulla said:
vadinho said:
You always put more power on the ball if you're moving forward smf, look at baseball; you're using your body more than just your wrists/arms which is what you're using when forcing offside off the back foot.


Not what I'm debating at all. I'm just saying they struggle to get to the pitch properly, which is why they sit on their heels.

Smile

gc.


Where's the congrats for the girls?

I get your point, they're figuring it's better to get less power but more control; I reckon they should just be getting half forward and hitting on the up. Girls can't catch anyway!!
[quote]
Yeah they played OK, but India were shocking. If India could catch or field we'd have struggled to win the game. There was probably 50 runs or so leaked through dropped catches and horrific misfields.

Also, we bowled 21 wides. That's SHOCKING. And only 3 of those were mulitples. So we bowled 18 physical wides... Three extra overs. We won't win a WC like that!

Positives:
- Excellent fielding from us.
- Kate Pulford scoring some runs (FINALLY) at the top.
- We look to have some good middle order talent.

Australia have to beat England and we have to lose to the hapless Pakistan in order for us to miss out on a WC final now. I'd like to it's gonna be an epic game, but it's probably gonna be the same as all the rest!

Wink

gc.
[quote]
WHAT A PERFORMANCE BY THE GIRLS!!!

373/7 in 50 overs for women is the equivalent of 500 for men!
[quote]
223 run win!!!!!!
[quote]
vadinho said:
373/7 in 50 overs for women is the equivalent of 500 for men!


No it isn't.

Whilst I agree on principle that it's tough for the girls to score big, sometimes the bowling is SOOOOO rubbish that they can plunder at will. Just look at the link I posted earlier. The only person to score a double century in international one day cricket is a woman.

Wink

gc.
[quote]
I hope we annihilate England.
[quote]
Eek 2 in 2 balls. In trouble now.. 49/3.

Hmmm

Car

gc.
[quote]
Great catch, then horrible shot, then great ball Sad