fish_boy said:
The fact is, not for the first time Espiner has broken an undertaking not to record or report the proceedings of a CLOSED session of the Labour Party congress in Wellington. Journalists are given privileged access to these sessions on the understanding they are off the record and non attributable.
The sad thing about this is firstly, if you listen to it clearly Williams was doing a throw away line and secondly Espiner's action will possibly result in BOTH main parties restricting losing trust in senior journalists to something as simple as keeping their word.
Williams lied about it. For sure the tone may have been a throw-away line - I wouldn't argue that he'd be
that stupid to give the idea serious consideration. But, he did say it and was caught telling porkies about it.
And it is what use is a closed session if you let the exact people in who have the most potential to cause problems like this? They should know better by now.
Actually, do we know that Espiner was the person who recorded it? (I haven't watched/read any news today yet).
Just assuming Espiner did record it under some sort of agreement, at what point can the promise be broken when they know someone is clearly lying about something and calling it a media beat up etc?
The whole thing could have been a nothing even if they'd just stuck with the "it was a throw-way comment" story. But Williams didn't play along and, no matter the reason/source, has just made himself look an egg (again).
R