resist said:
Pechora said:
Do we really need to bring gender into violence?

Something about these campaigns never sits right with me. Even though it's obviously unintentional, I feel like the corollary of explicitly separating out 'women-violence' is that male-violence isn't as important or concerning.
You and bob have a lot in common, if you are upset about the lack of female violence against men being represented make your own day. No need to tear other causes down because there's gender lines.
a) I'm not upset, I just said it doesn't sit right with me and questioned it in a fairly innocuous manner

b) I'm not concerned with any particular demographic more than another. All violence is wrong, I don't see a point in separating it out personally.
So what if 95% is reported from women?

I don't see how that's an answer for why gender needs to be brought into the campaign for violence to stop. Surely we still want violence to stop in all its forms, so why not devote the ribbon to the entire problem instead of just for half the population?
neil / gummi - thoughts on whether this kind of campaign could contribute to negative social attitudes about men?