disco_dlb said:
Rips said:
Also the sound of beats slowly slipping out during the mix can actually sound good!
Pffft, rubbish.
Rubbish? Why just because you say so?
Anyone that really understands live mixing with vinyl or cd's and what creates its appeal for both the Dj and the punters knows that a major part of that is that the beats can and often do shift against each other at any time. It creates different wave forms in the bass and adds a random factor to the end output.
This helps to create a certain under lying atmosphere of the unexpected and also keeps the Dj on his toes to ensure those beats never fall too far from the mark.
Digweed himself has commented on this when asked about his views on the new digital mediums versus old.
Auto beat matching and cueing can certainly allow you to do some great things and that's probably the way I'm heading but I have also herd a lot of very boring sets from Dj's mixing with digital assistance.
Its a different kind of boring though, one that I have not really herd in the past.
In some cases its obviously just making it way too easy and while the overall set flows well and is mixed well (mainly by the software) their is just no X factor what so ever, no real direction or surprises in the mix. The Dj has slapped a bunch of tunes together and let the software do the rest.
What you end up with is a mix that on the face of it is sound good but there is something missing that you just can't quite put your finger on.
My point is there are pros and cons to any system, the old ways still have a few edges over even the latest systems, it largely comes back the talents of the user and their ability to exploit them.
The digital age has yet to fully come out of its shell...