Not sure what you’re referring to here.
If you’re talking about the size of their GDP relative to the US then that’s correct.
But relative to NZ, both those countries have way larger GDPs. When adjusted for PPP, the IMF ranks Thailand at #24 and the World Bank at #23, while Malaysia is #30 and #29 (for 2007). New Zealand is ranked #58 and #57. Malaysia’s GDP (smaller than Thailand) is also 3 times that of NZ’s. Malaysia for 2008 is projected to meet its 5% GDP growth, with projections for 09 being 1.5%. Slow, but definitely not a recession…. yet.
In terms of “flimsyâ€, well I don’t know. That really depends on what aspects of the economy you’re talking about. Sure it suffers from things like corruption for example, but I would argue Malaysia for has much more depth in its economy (in terms of its industries, its resources and its overall balance sheet). Where it lacks most obviously (to me) is sufficient skilled human capital and higher wages or wage parity.
Regardless of what NZ’s exchange rate is to the US, the exchange rate between NZ vs Thailand, Malaysia or “insert country here†will also depend on the levels of trade that both nations engage directly in with each other. Also taken into account will be the capital inflow or outflows between the two nations.
Malaysia for example has unpegged its currency as of early last year I think – which is why its fate is no longer as much tied to the USD than it was before and its also why the NZD was so high against the RM for some time (as a consequence of the NZD being strong against the USD).
Asia is probably one of the last continents to start feeling the effects of the current financial crisis. They WILL feel it, however, but it will be down the line as the western economies demand for Asian exports start to shrink. There are a lot of reasons, from the way financial institutions are governed or owned in Asia, to factors such as the majority of FDI into Asian economies generally being tied up in local JV’s or in the setting up of brick and mortar businesses as opposed to short term portfolio investments as in other western economies (or in NZ for example, where it is tied up in bonds and the funding of domestic mortgages). As NZ’s interest rates decline, all these ‘investments’ will start getting drawn upon and as a result, will increase the strength of its home nation’s currency relative to the NZD.
From personal experience, I know of a Malaysian with a term investment in NZ of a six-digit value, who is planning to withdraw his funds on maturity of the term before the exchange rate deteriorates any further. I wonder how many more investors of that nature are going to be making that decision within the next couple of months?
I’ve got a close relative who runs a construction business in Malaysia (dealing in commercial development and government projects), who also has interests in NZ. He seems to think that Malaysia and its neighbours aren’t yet feeling the deep end of the current crisis yet, but we both agree that the litmus test will be in February next year, when a huge part of the continent enters into its annual Chinese New Year cycle and try to clear all debtors and creditors – that will be a very clear test of how much ‘real cash’ is being flogged around vs ‘paper money’.