kris_b said:
So you want to save money on the expensive $2.4b CRL and spend it on....a $5b harbour crossing? Even though traffic volume across the bridge is decreasing?
umm maybe that's 'cos they're using buses that y'know have ta use the bridge or 'a harbour crossing' or maybe they're working more from home which kinda proves one of my points
kris_b said:
And you want to extend rail in other places.....without realising that NONE of those rail projects can happen without the CRL happening first, because the system just doesn't have the capacity?
east west or airport via onehunga, west east or airport and south via same route do NOT require CRL at all and central to airport via newmarket as at present doesn't either or just about every other start point and capacity does not rely on CRL at all (but it would be nice I agree

)
kris_b said:
We ARE improving the existing rail network first. Over a billion has been spent already double tracking and electrifying etc. The CRL is the next logical step because it opens up capacity ACROSS THE WHOLE NETWORK, it's not just a little wee loop to let people nip from Britomart to Mt Eden easily. The rail network that currently, is going to run out of capacity in the next year before the electric trains arrive. Even once they arrive, the service frequency can't be increased, because there's simply nowhere for the trains to go.
Capacity would be extended far more if it were opened up to the north shore via light rail as planned for