mattdrake said:
So basically, it's 'if I can get it for free and it doesn't hurt me then sweet'.
Your saying this to the guy who has been trying to sell Pro-Audio software for the last few years?
I purchase all my music legitimately on-line, so the whole vinyl before digital thing is just a pain for me. 'Punishing' me for the actions of others.
Erm... mind is a little scattered at the moment - so excuse the 'stream of conciousness' about to unfold.
One aspect that ties into the 'manifesto' (which I also find to be ironic - lets try to break out of the staleness, but providing a set of rules to abide by) is that about mastering - one great aspect of the traditional vinyl release is that it generally meant that it had to pass by a mastering engineer at some point - a gatekeeper for the sound quality - and it was/is a form of quality control; mastering and manufacturing vinyl costs money, and therefore means that it has to be worth putting out (generally).
Digital distribution has removed this barrier - which is a good and bad thing - people who didn't previously have the resources can now release their music themselves, but also, people who maybe would traditionally be told to keep working on it, can also get their stuff out there. There is a lot of excellent new music, and a lot of shit.
I think the whole live aspect is a challenge, and I think part of the solution, or at least, the part I am going to be involved in, is the education of the 'punter' as to what is actually happening up in the booth. Watching someone play most traditional instruments, It is fairly obvious to most people what is going on, and are able to interpret that skill level for themselves, and include that in their judgement on how 'good' an artist is.
Now, technology has become a lot more complex, and often masks what is happening in regards to performance. Being asked if I can play a particular hip-hop tune, while half way through a live performance, comes to mind.
Does it matter if the artist is actually playing live, or miming? To some people, probably not - just have another drink and continue partying with your mates - however, this is the Techno Forum, so I would tend to think the answer leans more towards yes in here.
Do we need more regulations about 'how' we write music? Hell no. We need more innovations. What now happens though - is after any major innovation musically, everyone else want to be 'the innovator' - and how doe most people seem to do that? By trying to write a tune like that innovative tune they just heard. Where-as a lot of the earlier electronica was drawing its inspiration from sources outside of itself, jazz, disco, blues, and so on, now a lot of productions are really just self canibilization - which leans genres turning into facsimiles of themselves - as each person tries to make the biggest tune genre defying tune that still fits within self imposted 'genre' boundaries.
Er... and things...